06 July 2026

What is Graduate Entry?


Quite simply in the UK Graduate Entry (also sometimes confusingly called "Senior Status") means that a student already holds at least a Bachelor's degree and is on a shortened length programme that leads to a second degree at the same level. This can either involve not having to take the early modules completely or else taking a special condensed accelerated programme.

The most common Graduate Entry degrees are in Law and Medicine though I've also seen options for Dentistry, Economics and Veterinary Medicine amongst others at various institutions. The Open University's main graduate entry degree is the Bachelor of Laws (Honours) (graduate entry) which does not include the Level 1 modules (i.e. the equivalent of the first year of a full-time degree).

This should not be confused with a postgraduate degree which is taken at a higher level from a Bachelor's degree and (normally) requires at least a Bachelor's degree to enter. However, some institutions do not always use the terms "graduate" and "postgraduate" with this level of clarity. There are some Master's degrees that serve as conversions from one subject to another, such as the OU's Master of Science in Psychology (Conversion).

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

03 July 2026

What is an "honours degree"?


Most first degrees in the United Kingdom are described as "with Honours". It is common to see the abbreviation "(Hons)" in academic postnominals. Many people talk of degrees in two subjects as "joint honours". But it is much less common to hear what "honours" actually means. And related to this, just what is a degree without honours?

This post is only going to discuss the situation in the UK. That's common to most posts here, but it needs explicitly stating because internationally there's a lot of variation and it's going to be confusing to discuss the situation in other countries like Australia or South Africa.

Historically an honours degree indicated a higher level of achievement, usually through a more advanced course of study or taking a tougher exam, in contrast to a degree that could be labelled "ordinary", "pass" or "general". This distinction still exists but exactly what the additional achievement is varies widely.

In Scotland the distinction remains clear. The first degree takes either three years and results in an "ordinary degree" or four years and results in an "honours degree". On the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework an ordinary degree is an award at Level 9 and an honours degree is an award at Level 10.

However, the distinction doesn't exist on the Regulated Qualifications Framework used in England and Northern Ireland and the Credit and Qualifications Framework for Wales. (Aren't government websites awful?!) Both a "degree with honours" and an "ordinary degree without honours" are Level 6 qualifications. Other than the numbering (which is mainly driven by pre-university qualifications), this is the main difference in higher education between the frameworks for Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom.

(Both these level numbering systems differ from the Open University's internal Level 1, 2, 3 system that indicates the equivalence to a year of study on a full-time degree.)

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland it is now standard for all Bachelor's degrees to be offered as "with honours" and a degree without honours is usually a consolation. Looking around various official websites it seems clear that there isn't a single standard and many universities don't seem to publish an explanation at all (or if they do, they bury it on their websites). Various explanations abound online including claims that a degree without honours means:

  • Only passing 300 credits instead of 360
  • Scraping a pass but missing out on a third
  • Repeating a year
  • Not doing a dissertation

It would take a lot more research to delve into how true these are, though many Bachelor's degrees either don't have a dissertation/other independent research project or don't make it a compulsory module (including the Open University Bachelor of Laws (Honours)). A 300 credit degree would indicate taking two and a half years of full-time study or the equivalent which is awkward for most universities, structured as they are around whole years, but quite doable at part-time institutions. When the Open University began it did have an "ordinary degree" and in later years this was explicitly 300 credits, but this seems to have been dropped in recent years.

Because honours are now so standard it is increasingly common for them to not be mentioned, whether on CVs, in postnominals or other listings. This can even sometimes apply to universities themselves - for example here's the listing for Law LLB at the University of Warwick (Internet Archive version to fight potential link rot) with no mention of honours or "hons" at all.

And what does "joint honours" mean? Simply that a person is taking a degree with two subjects rather than one. It's short for "joint honours degree" but the shortened form removed the wrong word hence the confusion.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

30 June 2026

What are the Foundations of Legal Knowledge?


There's a lot of talk about "the FLK" in relation to Law degrees. Just what is it and why is it relevant?

Quite simply FLK stands for the Foundations of Legal Knowledge, an umbrella term for the core subjects that a prospective barrister in England, Wales or Northern Ireland or a prospective solicitor in Northern Ireland (or, until a recent radical change in legal education, previously a prospective solicitor in England or Wales) is required to have studied as part of the academic stage of their journey to becoming a qualified lawyer.

(Scotland has its own Law, legal system, legal profession setup and required subjects. I have struggled to find a simple single webpage to link to. The Law Society of Scotland website unhelpfully says "There isn't one 'required subject list' that applies for all courses, as it will vary dependent on where you study." Suffice it to say that a Scottish law degree is the starting point.)

These are requirements of the professional bodies, primarily the Bar Council of England and Wales who set the standards for barristers and, previously, the Solicitors Regulation Authority who do the same for solicitors (though, as we'll see, the SRA has moved away from these requirements). Crucially there is no formal requirement from universities themselves or from legislation for a student to have studied the FLK subjects for their qualification to be a "Law degree". Indeed, there are some Law degrees that do not require the full FLK to pass including the Open University's "Academic law degree route" and "Solicitors Qualifying Examination route" (detailed on the Bachelor of Laws (Honours) (LLB) page, but unhelpfully with drop down boxes - see under "Course details").

But most Law degrees still require the full FLK. For those who wish to qualify as a barrister in England and/or Wales, the seven subjects are (with links to the OU module description pages):

For those who wish to qualify as either a barrister or solicitor in Northern Ireland they have to take the above seven subjects and also:

Note that some of these subjects are sometimes described using different words. For example Public Law is sometimes called Constitutional and/or Administrative Law. Land Law is sometimes called Property Law.

And to answer many questions, yes European Union Law is still a required part of the FLK post-Brexit as previously discussed. I will eventually do a later post discussing whether this still feels relevant. Notably the SRA has reduced the amount of EU Law required for the SQE, which has the effect that the SQE route of the OU only has six of the FLK subjects covered in compulsory modules, though EU Law can be taken as an option.

Students are also required to learn basics such as legal research skills, but this often isn't a set subject in its own right and instead incorporated into other modules.

The FLK used to also be compulsory for the academic stage of a prospective solicitor's learning and training. However, in recent years this has been radically reformed inn England and Wales such that a would-be solicitor now must be a graduate, but their degree doesn't have to be in law (though it helps) and there is more flexibility to what must be learned for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination, of which more detail can be found on the Law Society's SQE page.

The basic Law curriculum has changed before and will no doubt change again in future. But for now these are the "Foundations of Legal Knowledge".

(Photograph my own.)

26 June 2026

How to cope during assignments (2)


So now that the assignment is over, just what is the best way to cope with them?

For starters don't panic. Many an assignment looks daunting when you first see the question but by the time you come to do the task it's much easier to tackle.

Looking at the questions early is useful as it helps with note-taking on each unit. It also means if the question has to be submitted in a particularly complicated format (looking at you, academic posters) you can start preparing the document or thinking about how to create a particular mode.

For most of the written assignments there's usually at least a whole week before submission set aside for the assignment. Often there's at least one special online tutorial devoted to how to tackle it, in particular format and logistics, so make sure to either attend or watch the recordings.

Try to find somewhere quiet and away from distractions to get as much done as possible. This might be a room at home, it might a library, it could be anywhere.

Make sure you have notes, both from the regular units but also specific to the assignment.

If you're on any online forums or groups, check in with them at a reasonable pace. They're good for knowing you're not alone and for getting advice on any technical problems but don't let yourself get too distracted by online conversations.

Everyone has their own pace of writing things. Some people can sit down and dash off a whole first draft in a few hours. Others find it better to write a single paragraph then go away and come back before tackling the next one. There is no one right way to write things.

When drafting, make sure you keep reasonably within the word limit and have time to go back and trim things down if needs be. All my OU assignments have been rigid with word counts and anything over the limit simply will not be marked.

Aim to get a first draft completed early enough to give you time to come back and go over it again.

The submission time is normally 12:00 but with a twelve hours' grace period after this. However, this grace period is intended for handling technical problems, not extra time in which to do the work. Make sure you are able to submit it before the absolute deadline. If necessary, check for the email address to send a copy to if there are problems with the online submission system.

When the assignment is completed and submitted then it's important to relax. Don't spend time worrying about what you've submitted after it's too late to change things.

And of course don't forget about them. Some students have only remembered they have them due at the last minute.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

23 June 2026

Is European Union Law still relevant?


It's been exactly ten years since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union.

Over six years since it formally withdrew.

And yet European Union Law remains on the curriculums of Law degrees up and down the country, often as a compulsory module. Why is this? And is it still justified?

The most direct answer to the first question is that EU Law remains a part of the Foundations of Legal Knowledge, the core subjects which are still required for prospective barristers. The Bar Standards Board has upheld this position in recent reviews, arguing that as the law of England and Wales still contains much law that originated from the EU and that transnational transactions remain key, it should continue to be taught. The Bar Qualification Manual states this as follows:

EU Law in Context

The UK has now left the European Union, but EU Law still has significant relevance to the laws of England and Wales and therefore practise as a barrister. Knowledge of current and developing EU Law may be used to assist in the interpretation and evolution of retained EU Law and as a result, for the purposes of the academic component of Bar training, the Law of the European Union will continue to be a required academic element of a barrister’s training.

However, legal education in England & Wales has been shaken up in recent years by the shift in the solicitors' route away from requiring a qualifying law degree with the Foundations and towards learning functioning legal knowledge to pass the Solicitors Qualification Examination. Significantly the Solicitors Regulation Authority has reduced the amount of EU Law required for the SQE to a portion within Public Law.

This effect can be seen on the three routes the Open University offers on its Bachelor of Laws degree. Those taking the barristers' route have to take the full seven Foundations of Legal Knowledge, including the European Union Law module. But for those taking the SQE route, only the other six are covered in full in the compulsory modules. This is shown by the way that students on the Graduate Entry route who want to get a qualifying law degree with the full seven Foundations have to take the three SQE modules to cover six of them and then EU Law as a standalone module. This module is also available as an option for students on the solicitors' route. For those taking the academic route EU Law is one of several options (as is Land Law).

(EU Law is also still compulsory for prospective barristers and solicitors in Northern Ireland. The Scottish legal system is very different and the core curriculum is described differently on regulators' websites but there's still an element of EU Law there. However, whilst an OU LLB with the right modules meets the requirements for the academic stage of qualification in Northern Ireland, it does not do so in Scotland.)

So EU Law at the OU remains compulsory only for those taking either of the barrister routes of the law degree. The position in other universities is mixed and it would take a lot more research than is usual for a single blog post to see just how many make it compulsory for all students and how many now have it as an option, though such a decision probably owes more to the debate as to how much all law students should take the full Foundations than a more specific one about EU Law.

Will this change in the future? This depends primarily upon the amount of law remaining in the system that ultimately came from the EU. The last decade has seen a number of developments surrounding the Brexit process and its aftermath with effects upon the state of the law here with changes in the relationship with the EU under different governments.

Any decision about whether it should continue to be compulsory for any route in legal education should be taken on the basis of what are the most important components of the law that a prospective legal practitioner should learn. It should not be a proxy for one's opinion on whether or not Brexit should have happened or if the United Kingdom should seek to rejoin the European Union in the near future.

So do I think it still deserves a place on the curriculum? Well I'll try to answer that when I've completed the module.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

19 June 2026

How to cope during assignments (1)


What's the best way to cope with an assignment?

Well one basic piece of advice is to not get distracted by writing blog posts!

When this current assignment is done I'll post something more substantial on the subject.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

17 June 2026

What Law degree options are there?


This is a relatively straightforward post looking at the various options for studying Law. So what are the degree options with the Open University? There's actually more than you might expect...

Let's start with the main degree:

The LLB is the main Law degree, but it comes in multiple forms at the OU with most of the variation at Level 3 (the equivalent to the third year of a full-time degree). There's the most traditional route based around taking the seven Foundations of Legal Knowledge. There's another route where Level 3 is mainly given over to preparation for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination. And there's the "academic" route where the final year options are more flexible and allow a more varied study of law.

Similar to the above, this degree allows existing graduates to study in a shorter period of time, omitting Level 1 (the equivalent to the first year of a full-time degree). It has the same routes as the regular LLB, though some of the options on them are different.

Both are mixtures that combine key modules to give a more focused degree.

The opportunity to combine the study of Law with one of three continental languages.

Perhaps the Open University's most original degree, the Open degree allows a student to study a wide range of modules, combining all manner of different subjects. One can focus on one or more subject areas whilst still dipping into studying a range of other subjects. Law modules can be taken though the Level 2 and Level 3 modules sometimes require students to have studied earlier Law modules.

The main postgraduate law degree focusing upon academic study of the subject.

The postgraduate version of the Open degree, though it's somewhat more restrictive as to module combination choice, requiring at least two-thirds to be taken from the same study area and the different sizes of modules restricts choice further.

As I'm doing a Bachelor of Laws that will be the main focus on this blog but it's far from the only option out there.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

15 June 2026

LLB, FLK, QLD, "law degree" - which is which?


There are a lot of terms flying around about Law courses, creating much confusion. Here's an attempt to clear up what the various terms mean.

A law degree is, strictly speaking, any degree in the subject of Law. However, it is sometimes used in a narrower meaning for a specific qualification required to practice as a lawyer, not least because of usage in the United States.

An LLB is a Bachelor of Laws degree (the abbreviation is from the Latin Legum Baccalaureus; for reasons known to those who understand Latin the double-L abbreviation indicates a plural). In the United Kingdom nearly all Bachelor's degrees in Law are LLBs though there are exceptions, mainly at Cambridge (which offers a "Bachelor of Arts in Law") and Oxford (which has an undergraduate "Bachelor of Arts in Jurisprudence" and a very confusingly named postgraduate "Bachelor of Civil Law"). In and of itself a Bachelor of Laws degree is simply a degree concentrating on the subject of Law. However, many LLB programmes are specifically designed to meet the requirements of the legal profession. Exceptions are known as academic pathways or liberal law degrees or some similar terms.

A QLD is a Qualifying Law Degree. This means that the degree meets the requirements of, and is recognised by, the Bar Council as completing the academic stage of becoming a barrister. Formerly a QLD also met the academic requirements of the Solicitors Regulation Authority to become a solicitor; however the route for qualification as a solicitor has heavily changed in recent years. A QLD will include the Foundations of Legal Knowledge (FLK) and also must be completed within six years.

A GDL is a Graduate Diploma in Law. For those graduates who either did not study Law or did not take all the right courses on their degree, the GDL is a route by which they can obtain the relevant legal knowledge without taking a second whole degree. It includes the full FLK.

The FLK or Foundations of Legal Knowledge is a term for the core subjects a student must study to qualify as a barrister (and, in years past, a solicitor) in England and Wales. The core subjects can vary in exact name but they include Contract Law, Criminal Law, Equity and Trusts Law, EU Law, Land or Property Law, Public or Constitutional Law and Tort Law. To qualify as a barrister or solicitor in Northern Ireland the same seven subjects must be taken along with Evidence Law. It's not possible to give full justice to the FLK in this post so I'll devote one to it specially in due course.

The SQE or Solicitors Qualifying Examination is a pair of exams that must be taken to qualify as a solicitor. Along with holding a bachelor's degree in any subject (not necessarily Law though it will help) and two years' cumulative qualifying work experience, this is the modern route for qualification following a recent review.

An LLM is a Master of Laws degree (the abbreviation is from the Latin Legum Magister), a postgraduate degree. An LLM is normally an academic focused degree and generally not a Qualifying Law Degree; however there are some conversion LLMs that function as QLDs such as Birkbeck's LLM Qualifying Law Degree and Wolverhampton's LLM Law Conversion.

An MLaw is a Master's in Law degree (note the difference). This is an integrated Master's degree that combines the content of a Bachelor's degree in law with an additional year at Master's level covering preparation for the SQE exams. Integrated Master's degrees are better known in Science and Engineering courses. (The Open University does not currently offer such a degree in Law; however it does offer them in several other subjects.) As a single degree they can offer better funding options than taking things separately.

An LLD is a Doctor of Laws degree (the abbreviation is from the Latin Legum Doctor). This is awarded by universities in one of two ways. Either it is given as an honorary degree or it is awarded as a "higher doctorate" to an established academic based on a formal assessment of their existing portfolio of published research.

A DCL is a Doctor of Civil Law degree which is awarded in much the same way as a Doctor of Laws.

And one I only thought about after generating the graphic...

A JD is a Juris Doctor, the name for the standard degree required to qualify in some countries. Normally a degree taken by graduates, it seems to be functionally similar to a Bachelor of Laws, or at least a graduate entry one. In some countries it co-exists with the first degree LLB, in other countries it has replaced it. In the UK it appears to have only been offered on its own at Queen's University Belfast and not currently (at least when I checked their entry for Graduate Degrees in the QUB School of Law), but some other universities offer a joint LLB/JD or LLM/JD programme in collaboration with overseas universities.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

12 June 2026

What is a barrister and what is a solicitor?

One of the basic features of the legal system is the division of lawyers into distinct professions. The two main ones and best known are barristers and solicitors. But what is the difference between the two and how does this affect legal education?

It's more than just what they wear.


Barristers primarily work in the courts or at tribunals, representing individuals or organisations by presenting evidence and marking arguments. Barristers are members of one of the four Inns of Court, part of the Bar and represented and regulated by the Bar Council. And yes, they're the ones who wear wigs and gowns, at least when they're actually in court.


Solicitors generally work outside the courts, mainly in offices but also in accompanying clients in particular situations. They prepare legal documentation and undertake actions on behalf of their clients. Solicitors are members of the Law Society and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. They don't have fancy robes or headgear and are generally found wearing suits or other office wear.

In terms of legal education, each profession has separate requirements which results in different pathways to them. Until recent years both followed a model known as the academic-vocational-training route and for the academic stage both required a Qualifying Law Degree (containing the Foundations of Legal Knowledge; a future post will go into more detail) or a degree in another subject plus a conversion Graduate Diploma in Law (again containing the FLK). In recent years the solicitors' route has been radically overhauled whilst the barristers' route remains much the same. The latter continues to influence the structure of Bachelor's degrees in Law but there are some law schools that offer greater variation to be able to follow either route or even neither. The Open University is one such.

(Images created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

09 June 2026

Full time or part time?


So what's the best way to study? Full-time or part-time?

As is so often the case, the answer is "it depends..."

With most universities there's either a single option or a binary choice. One option is to study full-time, taking modules equivalent to 120 credits in a single academic year with most Bachelor's degrees taking three years. The other option, if available, is to study at half this speed, taking modules equivalent to 60 credits in a single year, with most part-time degrees taking six years.

(There is some variation from this. Most notably Birkbeck, University of London, has a part-time model of 90 credits a year, so part-time degrees there take only four years.)

But the Open University is even more flexible than this. Students are able to study at whatever rate they like and even interrupt their studies, subject to an absolute time limit of normally sixteen years to complete a standard Bachelor's degree. Law is a more complicated case because there are tighter time limits for completion if the degree is to be used to qualify as a legal professional. There are also shorter limits when degrees are due to be withdrawn and a student has to complete whilst the modules are still available or find a way to transfer their credit onto another programme.

So one can study 120, 90, 60 or even just 30 credits in a single year, as well as taking years out if other factors intervene. It's a very flexible structure that puts the student first.

(Things are a bit more complicated at the postgraduate level. A Master's degree consists of 180 credits and in a full-time university programme it is taken over a whole calendar twelve months, including the summer holidays. But at the OU it is very difficult to take a whole Master's in a single year and sometimes difficult to take it in even two years, not least because many modules can only be started after a previous module has been completed and they each run year long. The new Master of Laws (LLM) degree is currently only available over three years. It is expected that in later years it will be possible to take the first two 60 credit modules simultaneously; however both will still have to be completed before doing the dissertation module in the following year.)

But despite the flexibility, on the Law Bachelor's degrees the most common patterns amongst the students I'm in contact with are either full-time (120 credits a year) or traditional part-time (60 credits a year) though there are exceptions. Full-time can be intense but if you have the actual hours available, the time management skills and the dedication that are all needed for an OU degree then it's perfectly possible to study full-time. In general the modules last half the year so it's only in an awkward six-week overlap period that the workload truly piles up and staff on modules that start around February are perfectly aware and understanding that students are wrapping up their outgoing course. Things are slightly different on Level 1 where the Law modules are 60 credits each and have a longer overlap period but with only two many have successfully balanced them in a single year.

Of course not everyone has the time to take so many modules all at once and that's perfectly fine. And one can vary the rate, especially when you move up between levels so you're not locked into a particular pace for good.

Related to this, legally all Open University students are classified as part-time regardless of how many credits or hours a student does (or is supposed to do). However, there is a limit on overall fees in a year that full-time students can hit (at least in England, the different fee structures across the UK are a regular source of confusion). So there are some financial benefits from going full-time but not all compared to attending a "bricks and mortar" university (though equally accommodation and/or transport costs are fewer).

So ultimately the choice is down to the individual student.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

07 June 2026

Years and levels?


Much of the terminology used about universities is based around the experience of students who've come straight from school or sixth form college, studying full-time at a "bricks and mortar" university. The statistics indicate this group is actually a minority, albeit the largest single cohort (see HESA: Student numbers and characteristics for 2024-2025). But despite this most terms (and many tables) default to this experience and talk about other students with reference to them.

The Open University is, by definition, very different. There are no standard rates for taking qualifications with some students taking three years to get a Bachelor's degree and others spreading it out over the sixteen-year limit, taking only one module a year or even a break. Most students study at less than full-time rate and legally all OU students are part-time. So talking of "years" to mean stages of a degree is fairly meaningless.

Instead, the talk is of "levels". These map to the separate years of a three-year full-time Bachelor's degree but avoid confusion with the time taken. So there's Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

In addition, modules are weighted in terms of "credits" with each level requiring a student to pass modules worth a total of 120 credits. This aligns with, and uses the same level names as, the Credit Accumulation and Transfer Scheme (CATS) which is used nationally by many universities to measure the value of courses if a student transfers or even just takes a module at another institution. (A more detailed guide to CATS can be found on the University of Southampton's website.)

(Things are a little different with Master's degrees. The taught Master's level appears to always be labelled "postgraduate" rather than "Level M" which has been used elsewhere. A student taking a four-year integrated Master's degree, such as the Master of Environmental Science, will take modules at both Level 3 and postgraduate level at Level 3.)

What can confuse further is the use of other "levels" in qualification frameworks. For example on the page for Criminal law and the courts one will see "Level" and then a list of "OU level: 1, SCQF: 7, FHEQ: 4". These latter two refer to the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework and the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Northern Ireland and Wales (although there's multiple within that). These frameworks cover qualifications all the way from school to doctoral work so have more numbers.

But much of this detail doesn't have to be dived into to take courses with the OU. Instead, there's a straightforward structure that makes clear where one is on the journey to a qualification no matter how long they're taking.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

04 June 2026

The biggest myth about distance learning


"Where'd you graduate from, a correspondence school?"
R.H. Macy to Granville Sawyer, Miracle on 34th Street (1947)

There's traditionally been a lot of cynicism about distance learning or correspondence schools or whatever it's been called. And it gets to the point where some question the validity of the qualifications at all.

To cut to the chase, much of this comes from countries (particularly the United States) with historic lax systems of accreditation for schools, colleges and universities. Often they did not have a system of national verification of the quality and validity of institutions and instead either left it to lower levels of government or, worse, allowed a free-for-all that relied on local reputations to make or break an institution. Sometimes this fed into a culture that viewed government accreditation as being hostile to academic freedom. As technology and travel developed more and more people studied further afield so a need for a system of validation became clear. Some accreditation bodies did emerge, but often the culture of academic independence was already rooted and it was difficult to get legislation to force the issue. And so unaccredited institutions, both good and bad, persisted for a long time.

Distance learning developed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and faced the question of whether the teaching was any good, especially in a country and world where anybody at the other end could set up an educational institution that would be known only through its advertising. (It also has to be said there was a debate about the teaching methods of distance education though time has resolved that one.) And so distance learning developed an unfortunate reputation for dubious quality courses from questionable institutions. Or more simply "diploma mills" just selling the qualifications.

Law in particular suffered from a backlash in the United States against correspondence schools by the existing law schools and legal profession in the years before the First World War. One of the results was the American Bar Association pushing a requirement for physical attendance at a law school for admission to a state bar, effectively limiting the value of legal distance education in the US. Most correspondence law schools closed by the 1930s at the latest though LaSalle Extension University was still offering Law courses into the 1970s (and fighting against the restriction). More about the rise and fall can be read at Legal History Blog: Missionary Man: William Sprague and the Correspondence Law School.

Fiction also added to this reputation, with TV Tropes even having a whole page cataloguing examples at Correspondence Course of dubious institutions and courses that really shouldn't be taught by distance learning such as driving. Though the page does (currently) acknowledge that in real life much distance education is highly valid and respectable, even giving the Open University as an example.

But the reality is that many countries do operate strict systems of accreditation and quality assurance such that distance learning universities are just as valid as physical attendance "bricks and mortar" institutions. And this is definitely true of the United Kingdom where a "university" has to be authorised by charter or Act of Parliament and it is illegal to offer unauthorised qualifications or even use the word "university" in a name.

So an Open University degree is just as legitimate and valued as one from a bricks & mortar university. Ignore the myths.

01 June 2026

How is Open University studying done today?

Originally the Open University was going to be called the "University of the Air". It's perhaps fortunate they didn't adopt that name as they would have eventually had to face changing a well-known brand to match modern teaching methods.


When I was young, the internet was barely a thing. The Open University still broadcast many lectures on the BBC, either very early in the mornings or taking up a whole morning and into the early afternoon on BBC2 at weekends. (Fortunately the rise of the video recorder was steadily releasing students from the tyranny of the early morning schedules.)

I also remember seeing a lot of OU course materials in the reference section of a borough's central library. Again these were the days before the internet was significant. Back then libraries would often contain a lot of reference-only materials ranging from encyclopedias to national sets of phone directories to all manner of special reference books so people could go there to look things up. Amongst the items at this particular library were shelves containing back-up sets of the core materials for each OU module that were otherwise mailed out to students.

Media depictions of the period show students studying at home with mailed out items but also sometimes interacting either through physical tutorials with OU tutors (e.g. Educating Rita) and/or physical attendance at weekend and summer courses (e.g. Goodnight Sweetheart - "The More I See You", the fourth episode of series 1 if you're wondering). The broadcasts also popped up in many other television shows as background detail (e.g. in Keeping Up Appearances they were often watched by Onslow whilst Life on Mars later used them to good effect as to invoke the world of 1973 with a twist). Many courses were assessed with formal exams at the end.


Today things are very different. I can't comment on other degrees but on Law the teaching is now all delivered online and assessed by coursework. We used to receive physical copies of textbooks but now even these are supplied digitally on Law Trove.

For each module the materials are broken up into a string of units. These are a series of webpages supplying the course material mainly in text form but interspersed with diagrams, graphics and video clips. Some clips may be a direct explanation to camera of a key concept, others may be a news report or other stock item to illustrate a subject. The units often have activities to do as you go, whether a straightforward test of understanding or a bit of substantial research and writing.

Supplementing this are the online tutorials. There are basically two versions but both operate as an online meeting. One is a general, module wide affair where one or more tutors will talk through slides, taking questions mainly at the end. The other is smaller with individual tutors taking students through materials, including activities and discussion. There are several different sessions for each tutorial and a student is not required to only attend with their own assigned tutor - indeed often the tutors rotate and not every one takes a presentation of every tutorial.

Students have access to an online library and multiple databases with Law being a subject that requires an especially strong amount of independent research to find statutes, cases, articles and the like.


Assessment so far has been mainly through submission of written assignments of various lengths and in various formats, known mainly as "TMAs" - Tutor Marker Assignments, "EMAs" - End of Module Assignments and even "EMTMAs" - End of Module Tutor Marked Assignments. On some modules there are also "iCMAs" - Interactive Computer-Marked Assignments whereby a series of factual questions are asked; so far all mine have had multiple choice answers. Traditional exams were phased out relatively recently.

Tutors are assigned to a group of students to provide guidance and support as well as to mark individual assignments and give feedback. Tutors can be interacted with through email, occasional arranged phone calls, online forums and in online tutorials.

There is an app that in theory allows students to read the materials on their phones but it's not very good with clips and activities so I rarely use it.

It's very different from when I did taught degrees at a "bricks and mortar" university though I suspect the teaching there has also changed a lot. My first degree involved almost no academic use of the internet beyond a few emails to lecturers and the ability to use the library catalogue outside the library itself. The exceptions were a Computing course and one other module where one of the academics posted the text of their lectures online.

One thing that is similar, though voluntary, is studying in libraries. Sometimes to get peace and avoid distractions I take my laptop and go and study in another institution's library, even sometimes consulting the books there (although usually the editions are too old). The Society of College, National and University Libraries (SCONUL) run the SCONUL Access scheme under which students can register to us other institution's libraries.

Although it may be different on other subjects with physical meetings and summer schools, on Law so far I have never interacted in person with another student or academic (although I have met some students at an Open University Law Society event). Nor have I had to attend anywhere in person, let alone had to travel to any physical OU facility. Truly this is studying Law at a distance.

(Images created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

29 May 2026

How accurate is Legally Blonde?

By far the best known portrayal of studying Law in fiction is Legally Blonde. And today it's been given a special twenty-fifth anniversary re-release (hence why I'm doing this post rather earlier than planned.)

Based on a novel by Amanda Brown, it stars Reese Witherspoon, Luke Wilson, Selma Blair, Matthew Davis, Victor Garber and Jennifer Coolidge:

Or there's the trailer for the anniversary re-release:

Does it bear any resemblance to my study of Law? To be honest very little. Regardless of how well it represents the US law school experience (or whether the portrayal of the murder case bears any resemblance to any legal reality), it's set at an in-person full-time law school in the United States. Almost everything is different from a distance learning part-time university here and going through every difference would be tedious. But there are a few bits in it that felt familiar such as the large amount of reading. Or there's the moment where Elle struggles to get a book from the top shelf, a common experience in the library I mostly use. And a computer is essential for both our studies even if it took Elle time to realise this.

There is almost an entire subgenre of YouTube videos of US lawyers and educators assessing Legally Blonde for its accuracy so perhaps it's best to just present one of those from Learn Law Better (website at Learn Law Better):


But however accurate it is, Legally Blonde has become part of law student culture globally, with many a law student marking references to it that most others instantly recognise. So it's good to be familiar with it.

And what about Legally Blonde 2? Well it's set after law school so not relevant here. And frankly it's one of those sequels the world could have done without. And I haven't seen the musical or Legally Blondes (the trailer for that is... urgh) or the new prequel TV series.

28 May 2026

How accurate are media portrayals?


Both studying Law and studying with the Open University have been portrayed in fiction, though I'm unaware of any that combine the two or even just any showing anyone distance learning Law at any other institution. But there are portrayals out there and invariably people ask if they bear any relation to reality.

The answer is it depends...

As will soon be discussed here, the Open University's methods of teaching have evolved over the years as technology has advanced. That in turn means many older depictions are based on a different study environment. Although some aspects of studying alone remain the same, others are no longer part of an OU student's experience. By far the most obvious in older depictions are the lectures that used to be broadcast on television, often at antisocial hours.

As for depictions of legal education, the more prominent ones are of American law schools. They are somewhat different from British ones. For starters Law in the US is a graduate degree primarily taken by those intending to work in law, so the student body is on average older and more vocationally focused than the average found in an in-person British law school. And a US law school with its own dedicated facilities is more of its own world than a British law department in a larger university. That's even before we get onto the tropes like having to know to do reading for the very first class or the Socratic Method of teaching (though when composing this post I did have a tutorial where the tutor went through students by name and asked us to take each problem in term). Or the various general tropes about university, in particular the 'College Is "High School, Part 2"' trope outlined at TV Tropes (hardly an academic source but handy for this kind of commentary), though for a US law school it would be Part 3.

But even if the depiction isn't accurate that doesn't prevent a film or TV series or book from being good to watch. And some have become part of student culture, often providing common reference points. From time to time I'll highlight a few here and comment on just how close their depiction is to current realities.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

26 May 2026

Why study with the Open University?


There are many different reasons why someone studies with the Open University, but they ultimately come down to accessibility and flexibility. The OU is built around the twin values of open access to higher education, generally not have prerequisites for enrolling, and the ability to study wherever and whenever through its distance learning model.

So there are some OU students studying because they have missed out on previous qualifications and are seeking to get a foot on the ladder. Others have more traditional backgrounds but prefer the advantages of the OU study model that means they don't have to interrupt their lives and instead can study at home and study at a pace suitable for them, varying the number of modules they take as and when. Or there are those studying at a different time of life. There is no typical OU student.

The Open University is a very different student experience from the traditional conventional one, with much more independent learning, but it is a widely respected institution with graduates in and from all walks of life.

For me, having been to "bricks and mortar" institutions in the past, the OU offers the opportunity to study in a very different way without tying myself down in one location for a few years or putting the rest of my life on hold. It's given me the opportunity to read a subject through to full degree that part of me feels I always should have taken back in the day but got diverted from for a variety of reasons. Now I can strive to achieve a law degree for both professional and personal reasons.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

24 May 2026

What subjects should you study beforehand?


One of the defining features of the Open University is the open entry of its courses. For most undergraduate courses one does not need formal qualifications to enrol or to have studied particular subjects before.

Nevertheless, people still want to know what subjects are good to take before studying Law, whether for an OU degree or for a more traditional university with entry requirements.

If one looks around at advice available both on- and offline there's a lot of variety on suggested subjects. But the most important point seems to be that very few UK law schools have formal subject requirements. They're more concerned about applicants demonstrating skills and abilities, including getting good results, than about how many subjects one has from a particular list. So if you're contemplating A Levels and thinking as far ahead as studying Law at university then you don't need to panic.

Choose subjects you're good at (if you're already taking them) and are interested in. Don't pick a hard subject you have no interest in out of some mistaken belief that you will need it to get accepted onto a Law degree. But it certainly helps to have at least one essay based subject on your list.

Popular recommendations

That said there are some subjects that are seen as particularly good preparation for a Law degree because they overlap on the key skills, whether essay writing, handling documents, analysing texts and so forth. But if you go to seven different websites you'll get seven different lists of recommendations. However, the subjects that come up the most in recommendations are roughly as follows:

  • English Literature
  • History
  • Politics
  • Mathematics
  • Sociology
  • Economics
  • Psychology
  • Philosophy

English Literature and History come up by far the most in lists of recommended subjects because of the essay writing, dealing with texts with sometimes complex language, analysis and so forth.

Not all these subjects are offered at all schools and colleges so don't worry if you can't take them.

What about A Level Law?

Notable by its absence from this list is A Level Law, though it does still appear on some recommendations. In practice an applicant does not need this to study Law at university and in the past some university Law schools have actually been sceptical, openly preferring students who haven't studied the subject before though this hostility appears to be diminishing. This 2017 piece Legal Cheek: Should I study A-level law if I want to do a law degree? captures a sense of the debate about it nearly a decade ago, especially the comment about the few students who had taken it being told to forget everything they had already learned at the outset of their degree, but increasingly it seems the scepticism is wearing off and the A Level is no hindrance to applicants.

Many schools and colleges do not offer Law at A Level and this has not caused a problem. In 2025 14,973 people took the exam, compared to the most popular subject, Mathematics, taken by 112,138. Not everyone taking A Level Law will have applied to or been accepted to read Law at university so it's likely to still be held by a minority of Law undergraduates. There were at least 27,150 accepted that year but that figure only cover those applying through UCAS and not those who successfully apply directly, which includes many part-time and distance learners such as most Open University students. (All figures from The Law Society Gazette: A-Level results day: Law degrees more popular than ever.)

What about Fashion Merchandising?

Someone always asks this question because of a particular well known film about studying Law (which is going to come up again on this blog). I am not aware of any A Level formally called "Fashion Merchandising" but there is an A Level in Fashion and Textiles. (Here are the specifications for one version, AQA A-level Design and Technology: Fashion and Textiles 7562.) I have no idea how law schools admissions officers feel about this one beyond it being a practical subject and taking at least one essay based subject is preferred. But fashion is a massive industry with a lot of legal issues (e.g. regulations, intellectual property, contracts and more) and an aspirant fashion lawyer is to be taken seriously. Indeed one university actually offers a Master of Laws in Fashion Law.

Is the LNAT required?

The Law National Aptitude Test or National Admissions Test for Law (the website seems a little confused on the brand name; perhaps they're trying to preserve the acronym "LNAT" because it sounds like the "LSAT" taken in a number of other countries) is an aptitude test used by a handful of universities in order to deal with large numbers of applicants with similar predicted grades. It tests skills and ability, not knowledge of Law. Currently, only nine universities in the UK and three overseas universities use it - see Do I need to sit the test? on the LNAT website for the up-to-date list.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

22 May 2026

What is a law school?


This question may seem surprising. The term "law school" is now widely used in this country but this is a relatively recent development and some have asked just what it actually means.

In the UK a "law school" is usually just the section of a university or other higher education institution that teaches Law. It appears that nearly all such sections now use the term "Law School" or "School of Law" in their name regardless of how the university normally and traditionally uses the terms "school", "department" and "faculty". Of course there are a few exceptions (and some cases where the website still has material predating the latest renaming).

One doesn't really "go to law school" in the UK. Instead, one goes to a university or other provider and studies Law or indeed any other subject there. A university law school rarely has the independent identity and distinct facilities of, say, a medical school or a business school. Rather the students usually all mix in together.

This stands in contrast with countries where many law sections are distinct divisions of the university with their own admissions, facilities and identity. In some Law is only available as a graduate entry or postgraduate subject. Thus, "going to law school" really does convey something very different from "going to university to read Law". This has brought the term "law school" into wider use globally and almost certainly explains why many a UK university now uses the term when "department" would be more consistent.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

20 May 2026

Why study Law?


Being with a university where one generally doesn't have to write personal statements when applying to courses, there often isn't a simple off the shelf answer to this question (let alone some text that can be simply copied and pasted). And often people find it hardest to put their personal reasoning into written form. Instinct governs us more than we realise. The decision is still taken carefully and rationally but isn't always the easiest to write up.

But there are many reasons people study Law. Not everyone is studying because they want to be a lawyer. Many are studying for the broader skills and application. At its base, Law constitutes the rules of society. Understanding how the rules operate and how to apply them is a natural reason to be drawn to the subject. The skills one develops through the study of the subject are highly transferable whilst the knowledge of a Law graduate can be extremely useful in many different jobs.

The study of Law can lead one in many different directions, both professionally and personally. There is something about understanding the order of things that is attractive. It's a rigorous subject not to be entered lightly, but studying it can be highly rewarding.

If you're looking for tips for a personal statement for an application then this post is going to be a disappointment. But ultimately everyone has their own reasons for being drawn to a particular subject and it's not always easy to put them into words. Often they just know this is the right course.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

Links and references on this blog


The keen eyed amongst you will notice that many links and references on this blog are not formal academic ones.

That's because this is an informal blog, not a formal academic submission. And doing references properly can be a little stressful.

One of the surprising features of the Open University Law courses are the mixed reference systems, with both Harvard referencing for general sources with inline citations and OSCOLA referencing for legal sources with footnotes. (For those wondering, OSCOLA is an imperfect acronym for The Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities.) They're essential for assignments (yes even the ones where you have to write a blog post entry) but not for here.

That said if I mention a case I'll try to include the full reference (though inline rather than trying to work out how to do a footnote on here). Similarly, if I mention a journal article I'll usually copy & paste the recommended reference (rather than converting it to strict format), including a link to an online copy, at the end of the post. But if I link to a webpage it will just be a straightforward direct link. And if I mention a book I'll generally just link to its entry on the publisher's website.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

Images on this blog


This blog uses a number of pictures in an attempt to make a look a bit more visually interesting. A quick note on sources and copyright.

A few are photographs taken by myself and credited as such. These remain my own copyright.

One or two are lifted from commons sites and (hopefully) attributed properly.

The rest are generated with Artificial Intelligence, specifically using Microsoft 365 Copilot by giving text instructions to describe a general idea and then refining it. So they're not fantastic. Indeed, a lot of AI-generated content is rubbish. (The graphic on this post in more ways than one!) That's even before we get onto my sense of humour. And they're subject to the copyright of AI generated images.

This is not a formal academic blog so the normal advice to avoid using AI at all doesn't apply here. Only graphics are generated with AI. All the text is written by myself (or quoted and linked).

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot. A good example of why not to use AI!)

18 May 2026

An introduction


I'm a Law student and I'm studying with the Open University.

This blog has been created to help share the experience and, hopefully, answer some questions along the way. At the moment I'm in the final stages of Level 2 of my Bachelor of Laws degree and it seemed a good moment to start this blog.

This isn't the first time I've studied at university but my previous experiences were at physical attendance "bricks and mortar" institutions many years ago. Distance learning is a very different experience and some posts will cover how Open University studying is done these days.

I'll also try to explain some of the terminology as we go, whether it's what "Level 2" actually means or explaining just what the "Foundations of Legal Knowledge" actually refers to. Or what the routes are for becoming a barrister or a solicitor and how they affect education.

Both Open University studying and studying law are different from my previous studies and I'll try to cover how so. And I'll have a look at one or two media portrayals that seem to be behind a lot of questions that get raised.

So come aboard for the ride.

(Image created with Microsoft 365 Copilot.)

08 May 2026

Happy Birthday Sir David Attenborough!

Happy Birthday Sir David Attenborough OM GCMG CH CVO CBE FRS FSA FRSA FLS FZS FRSGS FRSB!

Oh and not forgetting his Open University honorary degree, Doctor of the University (DUniv). (One of many but nobody seems to know the exact number.)

Sir David is best known for his work as a natural historian but he was also Controller of BBC2 from 1965 to 1969. During this time he directed the channel to find its identify, oversaw the introduction of the first colour television not just in the UK but the whole of Europe and was instrumental in setting up the broadcasts for what was then going to be called "the University of the Air". Apparently he was the one who suggested it might be better with a different title.

So a Happy 100th Birthday to the last survivor of setting up the Open University and so much more!

(Yes this blog won't launch for a while just yet and, as we'll see, this post is out of the norm. But I couldn't let this celebration pass.)

(Photo from BergenChamber, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.)

19 April 2026